Nepotism was originally used for the practice appointing or elevating cardinals by pope, and those people who were being elevated are either pope's nephew or realtives. In mordern times nepotism can be seen majorly in Indian politics.
From times since independence the centre stage of congress party is always occupied by people from Nehru-Gandhi dynasty.However we cannot ignore their sacrifices but we also cannot ignore their blunders.
our rule our blunders:
It all started with jawaharlal Nehru, because of his mistake we lost 1/3rd of kashmir to pakistan and it is now called as pok, another 1/3rd was lost to china during his reign.The so called last english man to rule India, he was very much intersted in converting India into a socialist state like stalin's russia.
Then came Nehru's daughter Indira. She is best known for two things, one is liberation of bangladesh and another emergency. However 1971 war was really a great one but attrocities during emergency were no less.She was preparing her son sanjay to be the next PM so that her family tradition of being in power continues, but unfortunately he died in a misadventures plane crash. Now her last hope was rajiv, who eventually became PM after her death.
Rajiv started reforms in his own way, people thought that if he can fly a plane then he can also run a governement, he was elected to power with an unprecedented majority, he sent India's peace keeping force to sri lanka only to increase the voilence, he struck a deal with bofors with a middle man as his italian born wife's best friend, it was revealed that Indian people were defrauded and the ghost of bofors still haunts congress.
India had to wait till 1991 to see a person outside nehru gandhi family to complete a five year term.
The legacy returned with sonia gandhi who banked on the blunders made by the NDA government to reach the power corridors, she refused the chair of prime minister amidst high drama but still possesing the governments remote control with her. The UPA government whose chairperson is soina defreesed the bank accounts of Quattrocchi(her best friend), by the time it was brought to the notice of the people, it was too late as all the money was taken by Mr.Q, even when Mr.Q was detained by argentinean police, the whole of the country was kept in dark before some unfortunate person leaked it to media, god knows what is going to happen to him.
Recently during the uttar pradesh assembly elections rahul gandhi was one of the frontrunner in congress's campaign, if he was able to turn the fortunes of congress then their would have been no one who could have stoped him from becoming a prominent leader, but his charisma did not work and congress faired badly getting only 8% of the total votes but still he was appointed as congress general secretary even after this debacle, he is also included in the party's 22 member UP Panel, is he that able? may be my question is wrong,does he belong to the gandhi family or not? the answer is clearly yes "bobs your uncle",thus he has enough qualifications of being a party gs, infact he is being projected as the future prime ministerial candidate, Why not they will even project him as the future Messiah just like other congress leaders were projected once, it seems that Nepotism flows in the blood of members of nehru-gandhi dynasty, and the rest of the congress is proud about it.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
Vinasha Kale Viparita Budhi
when ravan abuducted sita mata he did not know that his end was nearing, similarly the present congress government at the center and few dmk ministers are destined to doom, however in this kali yuga we will not be having any opportunity to see lord rama destroying these demons but surely common man who adores lord rama as maryada purushottam will teach these demons a good lesson in the elections.
In 2003 when the ASI surveyed the disputed area in Ayodya and concluded that a 10th century temple existed under the mosque we did not hear anything from the so called secular parties, but when they want to destroy rama setu they say it loud and clear that rama setu is not a man made structure, without any proper survey being conducted by ASI.Hindu bashing accompanied with minority appeasement has become a fashion, it would have been more fashionable if there was no rath yatra by advani which proved that even hindus can be a vote bank, till then every one took hindus for granted.
By and large the situation has not changed much, its only during elections that political parties care for Hindu sentiments, rest of the time our prime ministers' take pride in saying that minorities should have the highest priority over national resources. Although our country is secular we find crusaders cross on our 2 and 1 rupee coins, national mourning is announced when pope dies, some class of people get money from the government for there pilgrimage to middle east while Hindus have to pay thousands of rupees to chinese government for visiting manasa sarovara.
When mahatma gandhi spoke about rama rajya nobody questioned the existence of rama, even when the rama janma bhoomi movement was at its peak and even till this date nobody questioned the existence of rama, the only controversy was whether we need a temple at that place or not. Now we have a government which questions the very existence of rama, and thus rama setu is mythological and therefore it should not be given much importance.
The government wants to build a canal which will reduce the cost and time of travel between west and east coast of bharat, the present plan is to destroy the rama setu and construct a canal.By destroying rama setu they are not just hurting Hindu sentiments but they are creating a lot of ecological problems, lakhs of fishermen will be effected by the project and moreover according to few experts the project is not feasible economically. Let us for a moment consider that rama setu is mythical, what if it is mythical people believe that it was constructed by vanaras and government should not hurt the the religious beliefs of its people, what kind of government it is which is not ready to spend time and money for its people. Any government should not think of loss and profit, it should only think about its people but the UPA government is more interested in making profit that too by hurting our sentiments.
In 2003 when the ASI surveyed the disputed area in Ayodya and concluded that a 10th century temple existed under the mosque we did not hear anything from the so called secular parties, but when they want to destroy rama setu they say it loud and clear that rama setu is not a man made structure, without any proper survey being conducted by ASI.Hindu bashing accompanied with minority appeasement has become a fashion, it would have been more fashionable if there was no rath yatra by advani which proved that even hindus can be a vote bank, till then every one took hindus for granted.
By and large the situation has not changed much, its only during elections that political parties care for Hindu sentiments, rest of the time our prime ministers' take pride in saying that minorities should have the highest priority over national resources. Although our country is secular we find crusaders cross on our 2 and 1 rupee coins, national mourning is announced when pope dies, some class of people get money from the government for there pilgrimage to middle east while Hindus have to pay thousands of rupees to chinese government for visiting manasa sarovara.
When mahatma gandhi spoke about rama rajya nobody questioned the existence of rama, even when the rama janma bhoomi movement was at its peak and even till this date nobody questioned the existence of rama, the only controversy was whether we need a temple at that place or not. Now we have a government which questions the very existence of rama, and thus rama setu is mythological and therefore it should not be given much importance.
The government wants to build a canal which will reduce the cost and time of travel between west and east coast of bharat, the present plan is to destroy the rama setu and construct a canal.By destroying rama setu they are not just hurting Hindu sentiments but they are creating a lot of ecological problems, lakhs of fishermen will be effected by the project and moreover according to few experts the project is not feasible economically. Let us for a moment consider that rama setu is mythical, what if it is mythical people believe that it was constructed by vanaras and government should not hurt the the religious beliefs of its people, what kind of government it is which is not ready to spend time and money for its people. Any government should not think of loss and profit, it should only think about its people but the UPA government is more interested in making profit that too by hurting our sentiments.
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Appeasement :The congress way
Sachar Commitee
Justice Rajendra Sachar headed a committee to find the state of muslims in India
following are the findings
1.Muslims have a lower literacy rate
2.Muslim Parents are averse to mainstream education
3.The representation of muslims in the IAS is just 3%, 1.8%in IFS, 4% in IPS
The committee also wanted to count the number of muslims in army but was unable to do that .
There are still many findings but I dont want to mention all, you can find the report on Internet
So to solve the problem of muslims Sachar committee wants various kinds of reservations be given to muslims just like there are reservations for SCs'and STs'.
Giving reservations to dalits is justified as they were socially backward and they were boycotted by many sections of the society even till independence and in some parts of the country they are still being discriminated, but the case of muslims is completely different they formed the upper strata of the society, they were rulers in many parts of the country, they were never deprived of any opportunities, they were treated on par with Hindus, if they are still backward then there is some serious problem which has not been given much attention.
The basic problem is population which is the mother cause for poverty, illiteracy and unemployment ,generally a muslim family is bigger than a hindu family, and moreover if the family is poor the family cannot afford to educate all of their children resulting in muslim parents being averse to mainstream education, and thus contributing to the depression in literacy levels.So awareness is more important than reservation.Its such an irony that muslim fundamentalism is on rise in India and madrasas and fatwas are being given more importance which are acting like goons in disguise hampering the growth of Indian muslims. If government is more interested in doing something good then why dont they provide better education at cheaper costs, why dont they take measure so that more muslim girls and boys are enrolled into school.
Its interesting to note that the states which were ruled by the so called secular parties lags behind when the matter is about muslim representation, for example west bengal where left parties have ruled for more than 30 years where muslims constitute more than 25% of population has just around 4.2% muslims in government jobs and the same is the case with UP and Bihar, but gujrat seems to be good in this regard, so it seems that people who speak about the welfare are not really intersted in welfare they just propose such schemes which look lucrative but are not, they just want to grab the votes but dont want to pay the debts, its all about vote bank politics and it can be clearly seen when Manmohan Singh our Prime Minister says that muslims should be given first priority, did he meant that the rest of the people are second class citizens, I as a Hindu was really hurt when our PM said that I will not be given the same priority. The findings of Sachar committee are accurate but the root problems are not being addressed properly and I am sure they will never be just like BJP remembering lord Rama during elections, congress and its allies will appease minorities with such candies.
Justice Rajendra Sachar headed a committee to find the state of muslims in India
following are the findings
1.Muslims have a lower literacy rate
2.Muslim Parents are averse to mainstream education
3.The representation of muslims in the IAS is just 3%, 1.8%in IFS, 4% in IPS
The committee also wanted to count the number of muslims in army but was unable to do that .
There are still many findings but I dont want to mention all, you can find the report on Internet
So to solve the problem of muslims Sachar committee wants various kinds of reservations be given to muslims just like there are reservations for SCs'and STs'.
Giving reservations to dalits is justified as they were socially backward and they were boycotted by many sections of the society even till independence and in some parts of the country they are still being discriminated, but the case of muslims is completely different they formed the upper strata of the society, they were rulers in many parts of the country, they were never deprived of any opportunities, they were treated on par with Hindus, if they are still backward then there is some serious problem which has not been given much attention.
The basic problem is population which is the mother cause for poverty, illiteracy and unemployment ,generally a muslim family is bigger than a hindu family, and moreover if the family is poor the family cannot afford to educate all of their children resulting in muslim parents being averse to mainstream education, and thus contributing to the depression in literacy levels.So awareness is more important than reservation.Its such an irony that muslim fundamentalism is on rise in India and madrasas and fatwas are being given more importance which are acting like goons in disguise hampering the growth of Indian muslims. If government is more interested in doing something good then why dont they provide better education at cheaper costs, why dont they take measure so that more muslim girls and boys are enrolled into school.
Its interesting to note that the states which were ruled by the so called secular parties lags behind when the matter is about muslim representation, for example west bengal where left parties have ruled for more than 30 years where muslims constitute more than 25% of population has just around 4.2% muslims in government jobs and the same is the case with UP and Bihar, but gujrat seems to be good in this regard, so it seems that people who speak about the welfare are not really intersted in welfare they just propose such schemes which look lucrative but are not, they just want to grab the votes but dont want to pay the debts, its all about vote bank politics and it can be clearly seen when Manmohan Singh our Prime Minister says that muslims should be given first priority, did he meant that the rest of the people are second class citizens, I as a Hindu was really hurt when our PM said that I will not be given the same priority. The findings of Sachar committee are accurate but the root problems are not being addressed properly and I am sure they will never be just like BJP remembering lord Rama during elections, congress and its allies will appease minorities with such candies.
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
left is right and right is wrong
People interested in politics will surely understand what i meant by the above statement. yes, i am writing something on the 123 deal with united states
first, let me mention about some significant events and then continue my explaination
1962- sino-india war, few left parties supported the aggression which results in the split of the communist party
1974- first nuclear test under the leadership of indira gandhi, left parties oppose it
1995- PVN decided to carry furthur nuclear tests, but was forced to stop due to US pressure
1998- under the able leadership of ABV india conducts tests at pokhran, US officals are taken by surprise, left parties oppose the test
july 2007- left parties oppose APJ being given a second term because of his nuclear stand
2006-07- US promises of nuclear cooperation right wing parties oppose the deal fearing that it may affect india'a military expansion and that there may be restrictions on india testing nuclear weapons
when the full text of the nuclear deal was released there was no mention of nuclear testing, its a very ambiguous situation but congress says that as there is no mention we can go a head with our nuclear program but oppostion parties are not satisfied and they continue to oppose it.one wonders why left is opposing it, why is left thinking about india's nuclear weapon program while it was completely opposed to it in the past, they opposed APJ for his nuclear mindset which they are against and only in few days they have taken a u-turn.
It was the right wing parties which always wanted india to become a nuclear state, and they wanted india to conduct nuclear tests but now even the left want the same and they want india to have an independent nuclear weapon program, and the bjp(read it as right) is the one which started this whole thing with the US when it was in power and now it is opposing the same
So i feel that in this present scenario the left wing is behaving as if it is the right wing and it is wrong on the part of right wing to oppose the deal so i say
“left is right and right is wrong” in simple words the deal is good and its wrong to oppose the deal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
